UPND CHALLENGES CSOs OVER SELECTIVE HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCACY ON JJ BANDA’S APPREHENSION

POLITICS

By ZPP Newsroom

Source: Zambian Observer

UPND CHALLENGES CSOs OVER SELECTIVE HUMAN RIGHTS ADVOCACY ON JJ BANDA’S APPREHENSION
The United Party for National Development (UPND) Media Directorate has issued a robust response against civil society organizations (CSOs), accusing them of engaging in selective human rights advocacy concerning the recent apprehension of former Petauke Central Member of Parliament, Emmanuel "Jay Jay" Banda. The ruling party's statement comes in the wake of mounting scrutiny from various local rights groups questioning the circumstances surrounding Banda's detention and subsequent transfer. According to the UPND, critics are unfairly shielding a fugitive while ignoring the broader imperatives of upholding the rule of law and accountability. The controversy surrounds the dramatic developments involving Banda, who faced various legal challenges before his apprehension. CSOs and human rights defenders have raised concerns regarding the cross-border nature of his arrest and his eventual admission to Maina Soko Military Hospital in critical condition. Activists argue that regardless of the gravity of the allegations or any vulgar online conduct attributed to the former lawmaker, state actors remain bound by constitutional obligations to ensure due process and transparency. In its defense, the ruling party contends that the opposition and allied watchdogs frequently weaponize human rights narratives to obstruct legitimate law enforcement operations. The UPND asserts that fugitives from justice should not be granted preferential sympathy under the guise of human rights protection. Furthermore, the party stressed that state institutions have acted within the framework of the law to secure accountability, urging civil society to adopt a more balanced approach that does not compromise national security or judicial integrity. The friction highlights ongoing tensions between the Zambian government and independent watchdogs over the administration of justice and human rights standards. Observers note that the handling of high-profile political figures continues to serve as a