President Hichilema Commended for returning gathering Bill to Parliament

POLITICS

By Lusaka Times — Lusaka Times

President Hichilema Commended for returning gathering Bill to Parliament
LUSAKA – President Hakainde Hichilema's decision to refer the Public Gatherings Bill back to Parliament has drawn commendation from various quarters, most notably from aspiring Katuba Member of Parliament, Chooma Mwachikoka. Mr. Mwachikoka, representing a constituency in Central Province, praised the President's move as a demonstration of his commitment to democratic governance and the rule of law, emphasizing the importance of robust legislative scrutiny. The Public Gatherings Bill, initially presented as a replacement for the much-criticized Public Order Act (POA) of 1955, has been a subject of intense public debate and scrutiny. Civil society organisations, legal experts, and opposition parties have consistently raised concerns about certain clauses within the proposed legislation, fearing that it might perpetuate or even exacerbate restrictions on freedom of assembly and expression, rights enshrined in Zambia's Constitution. The President's referral back to the National Assembly suggests an acknowledgement of these concerns and a desire for further deliberation. Historically, the Public Order Act has been a contentious piece of legislation in Zambia, frequently used by successive governments to regulate and, at times, suppress public demonstrations and political rallies. Critics have long argued that the Act grants excessive discretionary powers to the police, often leading to arbitrary denials of permits for gatherings. The aspiration for a new, more democratic piece of legislation has been a long-standing demand from civil society groups advocating for expanded civic space. Mr. Mwachikoka's commendation highlights the perceived significance of President Hichilema's action. By returning the Bill, the Head of State provides Parliament with an opportunity to re-examine its provisions, incorporate public feedback, and ensure that the final law truly reflects democratic ideals. This could lead to amendments that safeguard fundamental freedoms while still allowin