Lubinda warns Kabesha over Lungu handling risks
POLITICSBy Lusaka Times — Lusaka Times
LUSAKA – The political landscape in Zambia continues to simmer with tension as Patriotic Front (PF) acting president Given Lubinda publicly warned Attorney General Mulilo Kabesha regarding his handling of matters pertaining to former President Edgar Lungu. Mr. Lubinda, speaking from the PF secretariat in Lusaka yesterday, asserted that the Attorney General’s actions could inadvertently lead to personal and professional vulnerabilities, suggesting a potential overreach or misjudgment in the state’s approach to the former head of state. Mr. Lubinda's statement did not specify the exact 'matters' he was referring to, but it comes amidst a backdrop of increased scrutiny and investigations into assets and activities linked to former government officials and President Lungu himself. The PF leader implied that the current administration, through its legal officers, might be pursuing a politically motivated agenda rather than purely legal avenues, thereby risking the integrity and impartiality of the Attorney General's office. He emphasized that the office of the Attorney General holds a critical constitutional role and must operate above partisan interests. The warning can be interpreted as a strategic move by the opposition PF to rally support and portray themselves as victims of political persecution, while simultaneously attempting to deter what they perceive as aggressive legal tactics by the ruling United Party for National Development (UPND) government. Such public pronouncements are not uncommon in Zambian politics, often serving to test the resolve of the incumbent administration and gauge public sentiment regarding high-profile legal proceedings. Political analysts suggest that the Attorney General's office is indeed walking a tightrope, balancing the public's expectation for accountability from past administrations with the need to uphold due process and avoid any appearance of political vendetta. Any misstep could have significant implications for the rule of