WHY I BELIEVE HAKAINDE HICHILEMA HAS EARNED ANOTHER CLEAR MANDATE

POLITICS

By ZPP Newsroom

Source: Zambian Observer

WHY I BELIEVE HAKAINDE HICHILEMA HAS EARNED ANOTHER CLEAR MANDATE
LUSAKA – As Zambia approaches the crucial 2026 general elections, the political landscape is increasingly dominated by discussions surrounding President Hakainde Hichilema's bid for a second term. A central tenet of the argument for his re-election, as articulated by various commentators, hinges not merely on the successes lauded by his supporters, but critically, on how his administration has engaged with and treated its political adversaries. This metric, often overlooked in the clamour of campaign promises and economic figures, is presented as a fundamental test of a president's democratic credentials and fitness to govern. President Hichilema, who swept into power in August 2021 on a wave of popular discontent against economic mismanagement and perceived democratic backsliding, inherited a nation grappling with significant challenges. His campaign pledged a 'new dawn' of economic recovery, good governance, and respect for human rights. While his administration has made strides in stabilising the economy, reducing inflation, and initiating debt restructuring, the treatment of opposition figures is highlighted as a critical indicator of his commitment to democratic values. Observers point to a discernible shift in the political climate since Hichilema assumed office. Unlike previous eras marked by frequent arrests of opposition leaders on politically motivated charges, including Hichilema himself who faced a treason charge in 2017, there is an argument that the current government has largely refrained from such overt repression. This perceived restraint, particularly concerning the freedom of expression and assembly for opposition parties, is seen by some as a mature approach to multi-party democracy, fostering a more level playing field for political discourse. However, this narrative is not without its complexities and counter-arguments. While the decriminalisation of defamation of the president and the signing of a new Access to Information law were positive